user-friendly!

-'Could you call me back, i dont have balance in my phone?'...'oh ok...sure'. 'Could you call me back, i dont have balance in my phone?'...'OK'. Now one is a student and the other is also not doing a job but is older, does it mean that the older person is bound to give calls by virtue of being older? Cant answer but if u being the older one despite without any income can stretch somehow and try to not think abt the bill payment as of now (i.e defer the anxiety)...would the other one, perhaps a pauper now, would make an allowance for u if and when that person's pocket is full of money, despite the fact that this person in present times overlooks completely ur current financial position and entreats you to take care of all the spending part. U do it because u would not like financial dimension to enter your equation with the other person, so lets say u do it out of ur own kindness- to relieve the other one of any stresses over bills and definitely not as a tribute to the other person's charm, which in any case diminishes with contricted heart they show over a period of time. both men n women are accused of this blame at one time or the other.

- Do they care less abt women these days? yes. Their intrigue has vanished and women have helped them by not remaining intriguing any more. Plus, persuing somsone calls forth spending of money, which men of today, dont want to do at any given cost, they'll make do with giving up their miniscular interest for women.its much easier. They are full of simmering resentment for women for not spending to woo their men. The same problem as mentioned above, why should i endlessly bend(spend) just bcuz im older despite both of us having no money (being on the equal footing)? similarly, 'why should i spend just beuz i am a man, she also earns'. They didnt think that before bcuz women didnt earn or atleast not as much...just like u dont expect ur kids to spend on u cuz they dont earn n do the part without any misgiving. Does it mean that women should stop earning to get men to show their care by providing for her needs and wants? Most women didnt take up earning because they wanted to spend the whole amount on their upkeep, hoard, blow it up on her addictions of smoke n drinks etc...she hardly has as many needs....the first working women lot were factory workers who commuted through local transport or on foot, most women still do the same. Look well at the faces of women in the local trains and you'd know the place men have relegated her to. She's tired, still not having sufficient to spend on herself, she still folds clothes, does as much cleaning as she can and does as much cooking as she can before she sets out to work, as if she's paying a levy to get out to work. SHE TOOK UP WORKING BECAUSE MEN COULDNT HANDLE EXPENSES ON THEIR OWN. He couldnt handle expenses because capitalism, corruption made prices of living high. Capitalism and corrutption are fully (99%) run by men....with next to none women in the position of power in politics or business. So, in short u create a mess and u expect women to clean it.She does it. U make her do it n thats how she gets filthy. We arent talking here of a thin spectrum of blessed women who love wealth as an addiction, not as a means to a happy family, but this band of women is far narrow than the band of men on the spectrum who do the same.

- They cant even stand minimalistic spending on their own wives. WoW! what if the marriage custom was reversed, what if they were the ones to leave their own secured homes forever, leave their lineage forever, their surnames forever and go into an alien surrouding where the man is scanning the number of breads u break. He does expect you to run the house well but he would neither give u care or money for ur work which he would gladly pay to a maid and incase, u dont do a good job, he will call u names and does a lot other things that are not right. He would however want his sister to choose a wealthy man and see it just as something natural that she marries into a family thats higher in station or atleast equal so that the poor darling sister does not make too many compromises or toils a lot.

- upside is may be- not all of them are the same (though statistics prove otherwise) and may be we can all re-surrect our positions someway without much stir.